8/14/2023 0 Comments Mactracker late 2006 imacHowever, L is superior on the final 4 tests, including particulary unexpected results on both the OpenCL test and the user interface test. These results imply a slight superiority for SL from CPU through Memory. XBench Results: (Snow Leopard Given first below) The differences I show below would exist in essence, for example, even considering the best SL pass vs the worst L pass (or the averages of the passes for each installation). I assure you that it would not matter an iota which passes I compared. Having scrutinized them carefully, I am going to report my results only for the best pass for each installation. I did ten xBench passes on each installation. Naturally, I was running 32-bit mode on SL since L is not amenable to starting in 64-bit kernel mode. Both programs were installed using erase and install. Also, both have identical apps, settings, and files. My test was carefully controlled in the sense that SL and L both are installed on large partitions of the same 7200 RPM external firewire drive. My current results were produced using xBench. I am trying to understand what might be wrong (or right) with my results because they are surprising. But, now, I have some results that imply the opposite-by a seemingly large margin. To date, they have implied the superiority of SL over L performance wise. "I have been doing a variety of performance tests. Below is what I did, my results, and the questions my tests raise. suggest that Sno is a better performer than Leo (which is consistent with most published studies). I have referenced some of my test findings above. I certainly haven't, and, as far as I can tell, my installation is virtually perfect. Consistent with what I said above, you would not get any noticeably significant performance difference from Sno. To me Leo was very nice and, while I know that Sno and Leo differ in many ways, it's somewhat hard to tell them apart in everyday use. The upcoming point updates are going to do nothing noticeable for performance except for those who are finding Sno to be incredibly slow (hopefully). Thus, I conclude that Sno truly would be as waste of time (and a small amount of $) for you (and that includes Sno plus future point updates). I now know for sure that your Mac does not have a 64-bit processor. I ask because Mactracker says that it's 32-bit, so does that mean that Snow Leopard would be a waste of time? I thought the whole point was that it's 64-bit, but if it runs in 32-bit mode only then I can't see the performance increase being anything to talk about.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |